Unit 5 – Literacy Review
The purpose of this topic is to write up reviews of all my abstracts and other sources within my research project. These include articles from websites, journals and other reliable sources. I will reference each abstract and source using citation. All the abstracts and other sources include the variables, measure and population of my aim. However not all three of these points need to be included in each individual abstract for my research project. My aim is to investigate whether height and optimal jumping height of an aged 17-18 male performance level centre back, affects the amount of headers they win to gain possession.
I am reviewing the literature to aid my research aim to show that it is relevant and purposeful. I can use abstracts and other sources to find similarities and differences in my research and find other people’s research identical to my own. The criteria that I used to determine whether the source was applicable to my research or not was dependent on whether it included either a variable, the population or the measure.
Teymouri etal. (2011) is a detailed abstract analysing the relationship between bio mechanical-anthropometrical parameters and the force exerted on the head when jumping in heading free-kicks in soccer. The research consisted of a pressure gauge being placed on players’ foreheads. Each participant was asked to defend a free-kick three times using the skill of heading. A camera was used to record the movements of players in terms of jumping. Specifically to my aim, this abstract aimed to investigate whether age, height or weight affected the jumping height and the amount of force the head could put on a moving ball when heading it away. Statistics shown that 17.9% of the participants headed free-kicks without jumping. On the other hand, 43.6% headed them from a standing jump and 38.5% of them headed the ball by jumping forward. This abstract relates to my aim in my research well as it includes height and jumping as my variables. My aim consists of investigating height and jumping in relation to heading. Although this investigation includes other variables such as age, body mass, body fat and neck muscle, the distance of the header was affected by these factors in relation to a standing jump or a forward jump.
Zonalmarking (2012) is another abstract analysing the factors that contribute to being good in the air (heading). These factors consist of height, jumping and heading. The abstract focusses on a range of professional players including Peter Crouch, Didier Drogba, Per Mertersacker and Michael Owen. All these and more have different heights, jumping abilities and heading techniques. Each professional falls into one of the categories depending on which they have an advantage over the other. This abstract relates to my aim in my research strongly as both variables of height and jumping are matched along with the heading. Being good at heading might not mean you are tall or good at jumping high. The investigation suggests that mastering all three of these variables assist to good heading. A disadvantage of this investigation to my aim in my research is that all the professionals being analysed are strikers except Per Mertersacker. Per Mertersacker is the only individual in the investigation that relates to the position I am researching; a centre back.
Ludwig (2001) is an abstract investigating whether players that head the ball more often than others have a specific technique compared to those that don’t head a ball that much. The investigation is aiming to find out how possession is gained from heading from those that use a technique or those that rarely head a ball. This abstract relates to my aim strongly as a group of players that frequently head the ball where asked to complete ten maximal jumps when heading the ball. This was described as analysing their jumping technique when heading the ball along with their execution. Data showed that jumping enhanced the technique of heading when attempting to regain possession. Jumping enhanced ball velocity making headers more successful. A survey showed that women that used a technique to heading also had the same effect meaning that it made no difference between genders. In addition, the ages were varied meaning that my population could relate to this abstract as one of the candidates was 18 years old.
Glennerster etal. (2008) is an abstract investigating how soccer players head the ball in terms of their reaction time and jumping. The abstract recorded that the reaction time of a player reacting to the flight of a ball was a trigger to an autonomous movement of jumping. This technique had been well trained to perform it repetitively. When this method of jumping was used, the direction of the ball changed the most from impact of a players head. This abstract links to my aim as it includes variables such as heading and jumping. Although this type of jumping is a result of reaction time, this jumping technique can be trained for my population to use when heading. This abstract has a disadvantage to my aim as it does not include any of my population specifically. However it does match what I am looking to measure.
Sorenson etal. (2007) is an investigation into the benefit of segmental movements within a jumping header and the extent of the result in terms of velocity, accuracy and possession reattainment. The movement of the head when heading all falls under the category of technique. In a nutshell, this abstract aims to find out whether the technique of heading from head movements affects the succession of a jumping header. This relates to my aim in my own investigation as it includes a jumping header. My variable includes a jumping header due to my population. My population is a centre back specific to the position in football. Centre backs need optimal jumping height to win headers against opponents. Therefore, investigation head movements when jumping is a necessary investigation that links to my aim well. The abstract indicates that head movements should be limited to reduce the risk of injury. However, on the other hand, head movements suggested to have a successful header, the head must move as a free non-restricted segment when jumping.
Shergold (2013) is an additional source analysing Cristiano Ronaldo’s optimal jumping height when heading in a a game of football. The trigger for investigating this was his mesmerizing leaping header in the champions league v Manchester United for Real Madrid. His incredible jump was due to the amount of G-Force he creates in preparation to jumping which gives him an automatic advantage over his opponent. Due to his height and G-Force, he is able to reach an optimal jumping height that is on average, identical to an NBA basketball player. His G-force is 5 times the amount of a cheetah in full flight. Bio mechanical tests were run on Ronaldo to gain all necessary data available including his body fat, body mass, height, diet, practice and muscular capabilities. This source relates to my aim well as i aim to investigate how much jumping can affect the succession of a header. Both variables including heading and jumping are investigated in this research. Although this investigation is calculating Ronaldo’s optimal jumping height, i can use this as a link to my research that optimal jumping height can contribute to a successful header.
Moharrami etal. (2011) is a source that aimed to investigate the effect of vertical jumping to head a ball by male students that suffer from flexible flat foot. The more effective the jump is, the better connection of header is the main result gained from the investigation. Students had to record their height, weight and age and complete a foot jump using a box mirror recognition plantar. The students would complete the test repetitively over a certain amount of days and relate their results to a header in football. The same procedure was carried out with the exact same variables with students without flat foot. A patter was calculated which showed values of ground reaction force vertically are higher in individuals with flat foot compared to those with normal foot. This enabled comparisons to be made when applying it to a header in football. This relates to my aim well as the variables of optimal jumping height are being researched as well as students in my population. This investigating focussed solely on the effect of jumping height and not the skill of heading. The fact that it is applied to header in football but not actually tested using a header makes the investigation relevant and supports my aim.
In my literacy review, there are a number of similarities and differences within the abstracts and other sources i have used. Every investigation has involved the importance and jumping. Even though my investigation focusses on football, the abstracts and other sources are football related or not sportingly stated. The major difference in the investigations compared to my own is my population. All of the abstracts and other sources research elite performers or lab candidates and not performance level players of which i am researching. Furthermore, another disadvantage is that most of the abstracts are primary research of which they go out and investigate the data themselves.
Involving the strengths and weaknesses of my chosen abstracts and other sources, some of them included an un-detailed write up that is cut from its full write up. Some of them are absent of a method where as some are absent of results. in addition, some research i have chosen are very detailed and well educated. It was difficult to understand the purpose of the investigation and the method they were using. Neither of the abstracts and other sources provided statistical analysis of world games such as the world cup or the premier league. Only the source of Cristiano Ronaldo was a sporting example relevant to my aim.
One key question that arose in all my abstracts and other sources were does heigh affect the optimal jumping height of an individual in football. Some sources related height to heading or jumping to heading. None of which made a link from height to jumping, from jumping to heading. In my research, there is not a clear triangular relationship between all three of the variables but it is clear that all the abstracts and other sources have the investigation to determine whether one of the variables affects heading in a game of football.
Glennester etal, (2008), How soccer players head the ball [online] available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18472123
Ludwig, (2001), Kinematic analysis of soccer heading technique [online] available at:
https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/3901
moharrami etal, (2011), comparison of GRF in vertical jumping for heading the football in flatfoot and safe male student [online] availabe at:
http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/66384722/comparison-grf-vertical-jumping-heading-football-flatfoot-safe-male-student
shergold, (2013), why cristiano ronaldo can jump higher than everyone else [online] available at:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2278671/Cristiano-Ronaldo-Why-Real-Madrid-player-jump-higher-else.html
sorenson etal, (2007), optimizing segmental movement in the jumping header in soccer [online] available at:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14763140408522840?journalCode=rspb20#.VPDFNuasWSq
teymouri etal, (2011), The Relationship Between Biomechanical-Anthropometrical Parameters and the Force Exerted on the Head When Heading Free Kicks in Soccer [online] available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955941/
zonalmarking, (2012), what constitutes being good in the air [online] available at:
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2012/02/02/heading-good-in-the-air/